On this page

A past scaling table describes a past cohort

UAC recalculates scaling from the performance of each year’s students. A course’s past scaled mean or mark conversion is not a fixed bonus that will automatically apply to the next cohort. The ability and results of students taking each course can change from year to year.

Scaling is about the cohort, not a difficulty rating

UAC describes scaling as a way to compare different patterns of study fairly. It reflects the academic performance of the course candidature, rather than a simple judgement that one syllabus is harder than another. A course that has a high scaled mean does not make every student in it receive a high scaled mark; your result in the course remains important.

A practical order for making a subject choice

Start with prerequisites and course requirements for the pathways you may pursue. Then consider where your strengths, genuine interest and workload fit. Use past scaling reports as context, not as a promise or a reason to take a subject you are unlikely to engage with. If you are changing courses, discuss the academic and eligibility implications with your school before deciding.

A good course choice is one you can sustain and perform in while keeping future options open. No scaling table can tell you in advance which subject will produce your best personal result.

Sources and editorial notes

Founder of ATAR Forecast. These guides explain school ranks, HSC results and the assumptions behind the forecasting tool, with links to NESA and UAC sources. These guides explain the process; NESA and UAC remain the official authorities.

Spotted an error? Send a correction.

Put your ranks
in perspective.

Use your school, subject ranks and cohort sizes to build an ATAR planning range.

Build my forecast

Sign in to save and compare your forecasts.

An experimental estimate, not an official ATAR calculation.